Examining the case for (and against) gold
By: Clif Droke, Gold Strategies Review
By: Clif Droke, Gold Strategies Review
-- Posted Sunday, 21 October 2012 | | Source: GoldSeek.com
Since
being shunned by traders last year after a series of margin increases,
gold has enjoyed a worthy comeback since turning around this summer. The yellow metal rallied from a yearly low of $1,540 to a recent high of nearly $1,800. All in all, not a bad performance in just over an eight week period.
Analysts and investors are divided as to what was the impetus behind the late summer rally for gold. Was it fear of a European-led global economic recession? A slowdown in China? An anticipation of loose central bank monetary policy? The reasons behind the rally are debatable but the gains gold has made since July aren’t.
We
were gratified to have ridden the rally in its entirety by purchasing a
position in the iShares Gold Trust (IAU) in early August and standing
pat until the 15-day moving average was recently violated on a closing
basis. It’s not often that a
15-day MA buy signal yields such extraordinary gains over a 2-month
period with barely any significant volatility or “whipsaws” (i.e. no
violation of the 15-day MA along the way). This summer’s rally in gold and the gold ETF was indeed a memorable and profitable one.
It’s
time, however, to start asking some hard questions about the continued
strength of the yellow metal in the near term, as well as addressing the
possibility (though I don’t say probability) that gold may have reached
a temporary plateau which could last several weeks. To this end, let’s examine the evidence both for and against a continued bullish outlook for gold.
The
first piece of technical evidence weighing against a continued gold
rally (in the near term) is the relative strength indicator for gold. This indicator compares the daily gold price with the daily closing value of the benchmark S&P 500 stock market index. The
implication behind the gold relative strength indicator is that “smart
money” traders and investors are expected to allocate the bulk of their
money into whichever of the two assets – equities and gold – are in a
position of relative strength. The gold relative strength chart is quite revealing. As you can see here, the chart has been making a series of lower peaks since January and hasn’t confirmed the recent gold rally.
A caveat is in order here. Although
the relative strength indicator proved to be an invaluable guide to
keeping traders out of the gold market when gold last peaked earlier
this year in February, in a liquidity-fueled bull market technical
indicators aren’t always reliable. A
market which is being fed mainly by a loose central bank monetary
policy – in this case the Fed’s QE3 program – can ignore negative
divergences in the various technical indicators, sometimes for weeks or
even months at a time. This has apparently been the case with the gold relative strength indicator since August.
My
assessment of this indicator is that short-term and intermediate-term
gold investors who haven’t done so should take some profits and raise
stop losses on remaining long positions. I
also don’t recommend adding to long positions at this time (although we
may soon have another opportunity to do so if gold confirms another
immediate-term buy signal per the rules of the 15-day MA trading
system). It’s possible that gold will continue ignoring the negative technical divergence in the relative strength indicator. It’s equally possible, however, that until relative strength improves gold will languish in a trading range for a while. Traders should be prepared for either possibility and not allow greed to overcome their better judgment.
Another
point of concern is that investors’ enthusiasm for the yellow metal has
reached levels which in past bull markets have been considered frothy
and suggestive of an interim top. Austin
Kiddle of Sharps Pixley recently observed, “Gold price sentiment has
continued to surge - traders have made the biggest bets on gold rally
since seven months ago, the gold-backed ETP holdings have reached
another record high at 2,565 metric tons while UBS has recently seen
Indian physical gold sales rise the most since April.” Seven months ago was when gold last reached a major interim top and just prior to a three-month decline.
A
pure contrarian would look at the current investor sentiment on gold
and conclude that gold has reached another major interim top. It’s
important to remember, however, that in a bull market temporary spikes
in investor enthusiasm, while they can produce short-term tops, are
quickly “corrected” and instead of producing major declines often
produce new buying opportunities. Indeed, a correction is already underway for the gold price but it could soon be stopped not far from current levels. If
gold is indeed in an interim bull market then the current decline
should definitely reverse without retracing all of the July-October
rally.
A final consideration is in order as we examine the case for and against a continuation of the gold rally. Earlier
this summer we looked at the important 10-month price oscillator for
gold and saw that it was flashing an historic “oversold” reading. This implied that a potentially major bull market leg would occur in the near future. This of course was fulfilled, at least in part, during the late summer rally. As
of October, the 10-month oscillator has rebounded rather sharply from
its previous “oversold” reading, yet it also remains well below the
bearish “red zone” as you can see here.
Historically,
when the oscillator curls up from an oversold reading the gold price
typically remains in an overall upward trend for several months (usually
around 6-9 months) thereafter and normally doesn’t top out until the
indicator registers a decisively “overbought” reading. That
hasn’t happened yet, so the odds technically favor a continuation of
the intermediate-term bull market after the correction now underway was
run its course.
